Iraq: U.S. Embassy Holds First-Ever Gay Pride Party

LGBT, NewsBites — By on May 29, 2009 at 9:32 am

Editor’s Note: This article was originally posted on the site Right Wing News. The opinions and perspectives voiced within this piece are not in any way associated with or supported by The Lion’s Historian writers and contributors.

In the short time that President Obama has been in office, there have been many breaches of foreign protocol such as an overt familiarity with the British Queen and bowing to the Saudi King. But the most significant indiscretion will occur tonight as homosexuality is promoted in our embassy in a foreign land–in Baghdad, Iraq, no less.

In the May 22, 2009 edition of The Washington Post, columnist Al Kamen wrote a piece entitled, “For One Night, Baghdad Gets a Pink Zone.” He revealed that the State Department is “holding what the invitation says is the first-ever U.S. Embassy Gay Pride Theme Party next Friday at Bagdaddy’s, which is the embassy employee association’s pub.” The invitation, which was sent out on May 10, encouraged everyone to, “Dress in drag or as a gay icon.”

The ideas of tolerance, diversity, and understanding are frequently toted by President Obama and his allies on the left. They have claimed that these attributes were lacking during the Bush years, specifically regarding Middle Eastern policy. However, by allowing a gay pride party to be sanctioned by the government the current administration is not showing any tolerance or understanding of the Middle Eastern culture and religion.

These gay rights spectacles are offensive to many in America, which is a far more permissive country in tolerating such conspicuous displays of sexually based behavior. Although gay pride parties and parades are considered abrasive by many in U.S. culture, this is downright belligerent within a Muslin culture which considers unveiled women provocative.

The Islamic culture does not appreciate or allow public sexual displays to begin with. Now the American embassy is going to display sexuality in a way that will do nothing but offend the host population, needlessly complicating an already sensitive situation. The question becomes, who is going to suffer? Our embassy officials, or our soldiers on the ground who will endure the increased outrage when events such as this occur?

Frequently cited among Muslims is not a dislike of Americans, but a dislike of the American culture’s brazen sexual behavior such as that demonstrated during a gay pride event. Prominent sexual conduct is considered by the Middle Easterners as one example of the debauchery within Western culture that they do not want imported within their homes and country, and they are willing to fight us to allow their culture to remain unaffected. A gay pride display sponsored in an official location such as an embassy can only serve to provoke and inflame Muslim distrust and distain for Western and American culture.

Gay pride events began in 1970, to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Stonewall “rebellion,” when protests and riots ensued for several nights following a police raid at the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar on Christopher Street in New York City. These parties and parades have since occurred during the end of June, spreading to cities around the world. In June 2000, Bill Clinton declared June Gay and Lesbian Pride Month, with the last Sunday reserved as Gay Pride Day. As this year is the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riot, there has been an increased spotlight on gay pride, even among our State Department officials in Middle Eastern countries.

Gay activists have become as aggressive and assertive as the police were overzealous in the establishment on Christopher Street that prompted this whole affair. The homosexual agenda has transformed from desiring equal treatment under the law to demanding state sanctioning of their chosen way to life. This has gone far beyond any private or unconventional sexual behavior between consenting adults, to a diminishing of dignity and discretion regarding private matters.

The liberals scream abridgement of the separation of church and state at the thought of a prayer being said at a public school graduation, a university that has accepted government assistance, a military service, or any other gathering involving government officials or funds. But now we have the religion of liberalism taking over the state as its church to espouse their theological values.

More offensive than our men in arms in an Islamic country are men in drag, as this strikes at the very core of propriety and decency within their culture. To the average Muslim, the threat of a Christian solder in their country to provide order is not nearly as threatening as the Westerners’ presence being the harbingers of gay pride and other events reflecting moral decadence. The Islamic world is already leery of moral decay in America, and tonight’s party at our Iraqi embassy celebrating conspicuous sexual behavior will only give the Muslims more motivation for wanting American and Western influence permanently out of their lands.

Tags: , , , , , ,
  • http://vyzion360.com vyzion360

    I’m not gonna lie … I’m torn. This is difficult for me. I just got back from Baghdad, and I’m going to tell you that the word on the streets regarding LGTB issues is not a good one.

    I’m not sure this was a wise decision. Not because I am against LGBT Rights (obviously), but because this is a Muslim country, and something so blatantly against Muslim beliefs is bound to be viewed as a slap in the face. Something such as this is sure to be more anti-American, anti-West hate cannon fodder for the extremist groups there, which doesn’t bode well for our Soldiers on the ground and our foreign policy campaign across the Middle East.

    I think I’m gonna have to lean toward the good ol’ “bad form” call on this one …

  • http://studwithswag.com knowledge

    Wow, I’m SO glad I read this. Where do I begin? “but a dislike of the American culture’s brazen sexual behavior such as that demonstrated during a gay pride event.” I love how the deterioration of sexual morality is based around gay pride events and not in any way associated with American media in general where at any given hour during the course of a day we are inundated with images and depictions of heterosexism and heterosexuality and sex in general from print to silver screen.

    It’s as if there is not a homosexual to be found in the entire country of Iraq based on their religious and culture norms that are the part in parcel one of the reasons the US decided to invade this “God fearing” country in the first place. That they dare be proud of who they are, sexuality encompassing, who do they think they are? This is my take from the journalist. He could complain about a number of travesties taking place in Iraq, but the focus is on a gay pride party instead of the US soldier recently convicted for murdering a Iraqi family and raping the teenage daughter. Acts such as this should be publicly vilified, not being proud of who you are.

    What travesty, this liberation.

  • http://studwithswag.com knowledge

    Playing Devil’s advocate. I do agree that there are some serious foresight issues that come into question in condoning such a thing. Not to mention the unmentionable: blatant hypocrisy. Government sanctioned to boot. It strikes me as odd all around, to be honest.

  • http://myspace.com/beloved_miscreant omi

    hm…fine line. i’m guessing the employee pub wouldn’t be holding state events, but, from a bureaucratic point of view & given the sensitive nature of our relationships in that part of the world, i can see how it raises an eyebrow.

    HOWEVER, the author skims over that fact to make it *sound* like it’s a state event, using what seems to amount to an office party to spout the same homophobic crap. i had to read again before i caught that. slippery bastard.

    besides, sexuality being “on display” in the west doesn’t erase the horrid schizophrenia underneath it all. as they say, if you have to talk about it that much, you’re probably not doing it.

    this country is still ridiculously skittish around comprehensive, holistic understandings of sex, intimacy, and human relationships in a way that many other cultures are not.

  • http://vyzion360.com vyzion360

    Hey Knowledge & Omi,

    Thanks for stopping by and leaving comments!

    @ Omi, I was quite horrified at the overall tone of the article, as well. I liked how you worded this: “using what seems to amount to an office party to spout the same homophobic crap. i had to read again before i caught that. slippery bastard.”

    The author is not at all unbiased in her review of the event …

    @Knowledge, I had to ask myself some serious questions about our “liberation effort” as well. Unfortunately, at a time such as this, I feel this will be viewed as more of a culturally insensitive jab than a helpful hand in the attempt to liberate the Iraqi people.

    Sort of like if the newly-re-opened U.S. Embassy in Japan following Allied Occupation during WWII had thrown a Chinese New Year celebration party; or if the U.S. Embassy in Germany following the Nuremberg Trials had declared an embassy-wide Hannukah party right there in downtown Berlin …

blog comments powered by Disqus

Switch to our mobile site